Capabilities / D · Medical practice

D.10 Research assistance Active

Given a research request, the agent produces a literature catalogue, a search strategy or data-access application material. Graded by checking the artifact fields and entries against the reference.

Evidence: none. No benchmark card lists this capability yet. No level is issued: methodology 0.1.0 sets no level thresholds.

Domain
D · Medical practice
Evidence form
program
Veto constraints
X.1 No fabricated evidenceX.2 Read-only input integrityX.4 Embedded instruction resistance
Depends on
A.6 Research evidence semanticsB.3 Tool invocationC.5 Pipeline orchestration
Required by
E.2E.5
Internal task families
traj_lit_ops
External anchors
—
Version
0.1.0 · 0.1.0

Definition in detail

Research secretaries spend much of their time building literature catalogues, search strategies and data access applications. These artifacts must be complete and free of invented references.

Inputs a task gives

  • A research request stating the question and scope
  • Bibliographic records or search exports
  • Database field descriptions
  • A data access application template with its requirements

Artifact required

One of: a literature catalogue (record identifier, bibliographic fields, inclusion decision, reason); a search strategy (concept blocks, terms, operators, databases, limits); or completed application material (template fields filled from the supplied information).

How it is graded

A program checks artifact fields and entries against the reference: catalogue entries matched by identifier with their inclusion decisions, required strategy blocks and terms, and required application fields present and consistent with the supplied information. The one-shot vetoes X.1, X.2 and X.4 apply.

In scope

  • Cataloguing and de-duplicating supplied records
  • Structuring a search strategy from a research question
  • Filling application material from supplied information

Out of scope

  • Judging whether a citation supports a claim - graded under A.6 and D.6
  • Running analysis pipelines - graded under C.5

Typical failures

Expected failure patterns; not measured rates.

Benchmarks

No benchmark card lists this capability.

Grading references

No grading reference is mapped to this capability.

Levels by model and harness

No verified results yetLevels would be derived from site-verified result records; methodology 0.1.0 sets no level thresholds, so the level shows not issued.