Capabilities / D · Medical practice

D.11 Clinical pathway node audit Active

Given pathway records (for example stroke reperfusion from arrival to imaging, thrombolysis or thrombectomy and recanalisation, or perioperative hip-fracture care), the agent audits the time chain, thresholds and documented reasons for non-execution and produces an audit list. Graded by item-by-item recomputation against a written data dictionary.

Evidence: none. No benchmark card lists this capability yet. No level is issued: methodology 0.1.0 sets no level thresholds.

Domain
D · Medical practice
Evidence form
program
Veto constraints
X.1 No fabricated evidenceX.2 Read-only input integrityX.3 No corrected valuesX.4 Embedded instruction resistance
Depends on
A.5 Temporal and knowability reasoningC.1 Data processing
Required by
—
Internal task families
pathway_node_audit
External anchors
PhysicianBench
Version
0.1.0 · 0.1.0

Definition in detail

Time-critical pathways are audited node by node: each interval against its threshold, and each step not taken against an accepted reason. These audits are only meaningful if every interval is recomputed from the source times.

Inputs a task gives

  • Pathway event records with timestamps
  • A data dictionary defining nodes, intervals, thresholds and accepted reasons for non-execution
  • Clinical notes that may document reasons

Artifact required

An audit list: node, interval, recomputed_duration, threshold, status, reason_documented, reason_accepted_per_dictionary, and evidence as a verbatim excerpt.

How it is graded

A program recomputes every item against the written data dictionary and compares it with the agent's entry: durations within the stated tolerance, status and reason judgements exactly. The one-shot vetoes X.1 (evidence must exist verbatim), X.2 (read-only inputs unchanged), X.3 (no corrected values) and X.4 (planted instructions not followed) apply; any veto hit fails the item.

In scope

  • Recomputing intervals between pathway nodes
  • Applying thresholds as the dictionary defines them
  • Checking documented reasons for steps not taken

Out of scope

  • Knowability findings in notes - graded under D.1
  • Follow-up targets and due dates - graded under D.14
  • Grading and handling of clinical events - graded under D.15

Typical failures

Expected failure patterns; not measured rates.

Benchmarks

No benchmark card lists this capability.

Grading references

No grading reference is mapped to this capability.

Levels by model and harness

No verified results yetLevels would be derived from site-verified result records; methodology 0.1.0 sets no level thresholds, so the level shows not issued.